Best Practices

Are AI Coding Tools Worth the Security Risk? What You Need to Know AI coding assistants like GitHub Copilot, Cursor, and Claude Code have changed how developers write software. The promise is real: faster debugging, less boilerplate, and help with unfamiliar languages. But over the past year, a series of security incidents has raised uncomfortable questions. A two-click exploit in Cursor allowed attackers to take over a developer’s environment. Claude Code had a vulnerability called “TrustFall” that enabled code execution through a trusted relationship. And researchers showed that poisoned repositories could cause these tools to auto-execute malicious code. The productivity gains are undeniable. The question is whether the risks are manageable. ...

AI Coding Tools: How to Protect Your Code and Devices from New Exploits AI coding assistants have become almost indispensable for many developers, promising faster iteration and fewer boilerplate tasks. But the security trade-off is real: a series of reports over the past few months show that these tools can also become vectors for serious attacks. The question is not whether to use them, but how to do so safely. ...

AI Coding Assistants: Staying Productive Without Inflaming Supply Chain Risks AI coding tools like Cursor, GitHub Copilot, and Claude Code have become common in many developers’ workflows. They accelerate boilerplate writing, catch syntax issues, and suggest entire functions from natural-language prompts. The productivity gains are real—but so are the security risks that have emerged alongside them. ...

AI coding tools are a security risk: how to protect your code and privacy AI coding assistants such as Cursor, Claude Code, and GitHub Copilot have become indispensable for many developers. They autocomplete snippets, generate boilerplate, and even refactor entire functions. The productivity gains are real—but so are the security risks. Recent incidents show that these tools can introduce new attack surfaces that traditional security controls don’t fully cover. ...

AI Coding Assistants: Are Security Risks Worth the Productivity Gains? AI‑powered coding tools like GitHub Copilot, Claude, and others have become nearly indispensable for many developers. They promise faster code generation, fewer boilerplate tasks, and less context‑switching. But as adoption accelerates, so do reports of new attack surfaces—malicious pull requests, code execution vulnerabilities, and supply chain weaknesses. The question is becoming harder to ignore: do the security risks cancel out the productivity gains? ...

AI Coding Assistants: Security Risks You Can’t Ignore (and How to Fix Them) The appeal is obvious: AI coding assistants like GitHub Copilot and Anthropic’s Claude can write boilerplate, suggest fixes, and even generate entire functions in seconds. For teams under pressure to ship faster, the productivity gain is real. But a string of security incidents in 2026 has made one thing clear—these tools can also introduce serious risks that no one should brush aside. ...

What Microsoft’s Year of Email Security Data Reveals About Your Threats In June 2026, Microsoft published a comprehensive analysis of email security data collected over the preceding twelve months. The report, based on telemetry from Microsoft Defender for Office 365, covers the threats that organizations face most often, the configurations that leave them exposed, and the benchmarks that security teams can use to measure their own defenses. For any IT professional or business owner responsible for email security, it is a practical dataset worth understanding. ...